Agenda 21 first came into being as a “non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations regarding sustainable development” at the UN Conference on Environment and Development in 1992. The icleausa.org website says the gathering, also known as “Earth Summit,” took place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. However, based on whom you ask, this document may be more than that.
The original Agenda 21 document (photo from agendatwentyone.wordpress.com)
Visit the bgci.org website and you’ll find Agenda 21 described as a “process for meeting the needs of the present generation without harming the ability of future generations to meet their needs.” Americanfreedomwatchradio.com calls Agenda 21 an “elitist plan to control your life, demanding you do as I say not as I do.”
Agenda 21 is born
According to the un.com website, the “Earth Summit” was a first-of-its-kind U.N. Conference, both in terms of the number of attendees, and the wide-ranging scope of concerns it dealt with. The U.N. sought to help world governments redo their economic development processes, as well as limit the use of disappearing natural resources and reduce damage to the environment.
Hundreds of thousands of people attended the conference in Rio. The message of the conference was “that nothing less that a complete change of thinking, in both attitudes and behaviors, would bring about necessary changes.”
Townhall.com notes as a result of the Earth Summit, over 170 countries signed on to Agenda 21, including then-American President George H.W. Bush
Earth Summit delegates signing the Earth Pledge (photo from the guardian.com)
Agenda 21 and hidden motives
Americans Against Agenda 21 is a group based in Rochester, Minnesota, and in recent years began noticing some interesting terms popping up in their local neighborhood planning meetings.
Their website, aaa21.org, notes the terms included “sustainable development, open space, heritage areas, historic preservation, comprehensive managing, growth areas, and smart growth.” The group said, “all of these terms sound good, and we thought they were things we could support.” However, as time went by, they learned more about Agenda 21.
AAA21 says those “good sounding terms have a foundation directly in Agenda 21.”
More walking paths over fewer cars on the roads because of Agenda 21? (photo by Chad Smith)
The website notes that some readers may think it “sounds like a crazy conspiracy.” They say, “It may sound like some crazy kook theory that the average person should just write off.” They encourage readers to look through all the evidence on their website and make their own decisions.
The people behind Agenda 21
Glen Beck is a one-time political commentator for Fox News, and he offered some evidence supporting the theory that Agenda 21 is not what it seems:
Plans in motion
In a video posted by Jason A on Youtube.com, local communities around the country are realizing what Agenda 21 actually is: an infiltration of local governments by globalists in the United Nations:
The “stack em and pack em” comment in the video caught the attention of Steve Roberts, a member of Rochester, Minnesota-based Americans Against Agenda 21. He says it’s begun happening in recent years to Rochester residents.
“In recent years, planning department are putting increasing pressure on homeowner associations regarding an increasing number of bike paths, less and less parking, and shoe-horning multi-family developments into residential areas.”
He offered up the example of a new development on Fifth Avenue Southwest in Rochester. “It’s right there, literally next door to single-family homes on all sides,” said Roberts. “Neighborhood residents didn’t want it there, but the city said the
More multi-family dwellings and less homes in Agenda 21? (Photo by Chad Smith)
project owner did due diligence, and we’re going to allow it, right in the middle of a residential neighborhood.” His allegations were confirmed in Amendment to Land Use Planning #R2014-001LUPA, showing a medium-density, multi-family dwelling put into a residential neighborhood.
He offered as proof of his claims a written document that Rochester’s membership in the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives, which is a United Nations-backed organization, directly created by the original Agenda 21 document to influence local governments. Roberts included a string of emails with then-Rochester City Planner Phil Wheeler stating Rochester’s ICLEI dues totaled $1,710.
What happens to modern Agriculture under Agenda 21? (photo by Chad Smith)
“This is not going to go away,” said Roberts.
The americanpolicy.org website agrees with Roberts. They say, “Isn’t Agenda 21 just a plan to protect the environment and stop urban sprawl?” No. They say they oppose Agenda 21 because it is designed to control every aspect of our lives.
How will Agenda 21 affect individuals?
The teaparty911.org website called Agenda 21 “a substantial attack on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.” They state Agenda 21 is designed to replace the economic and social structure of the United States, and offered up some of the “unsustainable” targets:
||Unsustainable =We will take this away!
||Grazing of livestock
||Disturbance of soil surface-plowing of soil, building fences
||Commercial Agriculture-Modern farm production, chemical fertilizers, fossil fuels, etc.
||Any Industrial activity
||“Human-made caves of brick and mortar (single family homes)
||Paved and tarred roads, Railroads, floor and wall tiles
||Technology, range lands, fish ponds, plantations or rangelands
||Harvesting timber and modern hunting
||Dams and reservoirs, straightening of rivers
||Power line construction
||Economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.
Will Agenda 21 mean the end of golf courses? (Photo by Chad Smith)
Conspiracy theory or sound policy?
Americans Against Agenda 21 said on it’s website, “after investigation, we found that the essential elements of this document are being supported locally, sometimes using public tax dollars. Not only are the elements supported, they are being implemented as well.”
They say it’s “not remote. It’s not abstract and off in the future. It’s here, and it’s here now.”
They and other groups against Agenda 21 invite readers to do their own research, and form their own opinions on whether or not it’s a global conspiracy or sound environmental policy.